Volume 10, Number 2, June 2004
Copyright © 2004 Society for Music Theory

6.2 Scale-Degree Results

[1] Based on a statistical model (see §5.2) fit to triads by Haydn, Mozart, and J.S. Bach, the figures below estimate the probability that a triad is composed (see §4.1) rather than random (see §4.2). For each scale degree, the figures show an estimated probability and a 95% confidence interval for that estimate. Scale degrees that composers preferred to double have probabilities above 50%; scale degrees that composers avoided doubling have probabilities below 50%.

[2] In major mode, for example, a poorly-spaced triad that doubles the leading tone has a 15-24% probability of being composed. If the triad is well spaced, the probability of being composed is higher (25-35%), but still less than 50%. Either way, it seems that Bach, Haydn, and Mozart avoided doubling the leading tone.

Figure 6.2a. Probability that a triad is composed if it doubles a specific triad member.
For example, in major mode (top), a triad that doubles the 7th scale degree has a 25-35%
chance of being composed rather than random--provided the chord is well-spaced (black).
If the triad is poorly spaced (red), this probability drops to 15-24%. In either case, the results
fit the idea that these composers avoided doubling the leading tone.


[3] On the whole, the graphs are consistent with the most commonly taught rules for doubling scale degrees: avoid doubling the leading tone and any chromatics. In minor mode, the second scale degree may also be avoided to some extent, perhaps because it can act as a leading tone to the relative major.(82)

[4] These results may be interpreted in at least two ways:

  1. One interpretation is that doubling reinforces the key by emphasizing "strong" scale degrees--for example, the degrees with high values in the Krumhansl-Kessler key profiles. (See §6.2.1.)
  2. A second interpretation is that doubling aids voice-leading by avoiding unstable "tendency tones." When tendency tones are doubled, it becomes impossible to use conjunct motion while avoiding parallel octaves. The avoidance of tendency tones makes it much easier to avoid parallels gracefully.

[5] Our results do not decide between these interpretations. Either could explain why the leading tone and chromatics are least likely to be doubled. But neither interpretation can explain the differences among the other scale degrees. According to the tendency tone interpretation, doubling should favor all non-tendency tones equally--but Figure 6.2a does not support this, at least not in major mode. According to the Krumhansl-Kessler profiles, doubling should favor the notes of the tonic triad over other diatonic tones (see §6.2.1)--but Figure 6.2a does not support this, either. On balance, it seems that either voice-leading or tonality concerns could explain doubling practice--but neither explains it perfectly.

Back to §6 (Results)

Go on to §6.2.1 (Key Profiles)
Go on to §6.3 (Comparative Results)

Copyright Statement

Copyright © 2004 by the Society for Music Theory. All rights reserved.

[1] Copyrights for individual items published in Music Theory Online (MTO) are held by their authors. Items appearing in MTO may be saved and stored in electronic or paper form, and may be shared among individuals for purposes of scholarly research or discussion, but may not be republished in any form, electronic or print, without prior, written permission from the author(s), and advance notification of the editors of MTO.

[2] Any redistributed form of items published in MTO must include the following information in a form appropriate to the medium in which the items are to appear:

This item appeared in Music Theory Online in [VOLUME #, ISSUE #] on [DAY/MONTH/YEAR]. It was authored by [FULL NAME, EMAIL ADDRESS], with whose written permission it is reprinted here.

[3] Libraries may archive issues of MTO in electronic or paper form for public access so long as each issue is stored in its entirety, and no access fee is charged. Exceptions to these requirements must be approved in writing by the editors of MTO, who will act in accordance with the decisions of the Society for Music Theory.

This document and all portions thereof are protected by U.S. and international copyright laws. Material contained herein may be copied and/or distributed for research purposes only.

    Return to beginning    


Prepared by Brent Yorgason, Managing Editor and Tahirih Motazedian, Editorial Assistant