Copyright © 2004 Society for Music Theory
6.1 Triad-Member Results
[1] Based on a statistical model (see §5.2) fit to triads by Haydn, Mozart, and J.S. Bach, Figure 6.1a below shows the probability that a triad is composed (see §4.1) rather than random (see §4.2). For triads of each quality and inversion, the figure gives a 95% confidence interval for the probability that the triad is composed. Triad members that composers preferred to double have probabilities above 50%; triad members that composers avoided doubling have probabilities below 50%.
[2] The upper left panel, for example, shows probabilities for a major root-position triad. If such a triad doubles the root and is well-spaced, there is a 75%-79% probability that it is composed. If the triad doubles the root and is poorly spaced (red), its probability of being composed is lower (64%-70%), but still greater than 50%. In sum, the panel suggests that Bach, Haydn, and Mozart favored doubling the root of major root-position triads.
Figure 6.1a. Probability that a triad is composed if it doubles a specific triad member. Each panel of the 3x3 grid represents a different triad quality and inversion. Within each panel, the black bars represent triads that are well-spaced in the sense that their largest space is between their lowest voices; the red bars represent triads that are poorly-spaced by the same criterion.
|
[3] These results suggest the following rules:
|
favor doubling the root. avoid doubling the third. favor doubling the fifth. avoid doubling the fifth. avoid doubling the root. |
[4] These are consistent with the most commonly taught rules for doubling triad members. There are several versions of the triad-member rules, however, some of which are not consistent with these results at all (see §2.1).
[5] Even the "correct" triad-member rules, however, have limited pedagogical utility. First, it is difficult to summarize the triad-members rules in a concise and theoretically convincing fashion. Second, many of the triad-member preferences are extremely mild. In first-inversion major triads, for example, doubling the third is barely less likely in composed triads than in random triads. It seems that Bach, Haydn, and Mozart were not strongly averse to doubling the third -- so students should not be faulted for doing so now and then.
[6] For these reasons, we prefer to teach the scale-degree rules (see
§6.2). Compared to the triad-member preferences, the scale-degree
preferences are stronger and more theoretically convincing, and their fit to
musical practice is practically equivalent (see
§6.3).
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2004 by the Society for Music Theory. All rights reserved.
[1] Copyrights for individual items published in Music Theory Online (MTO) are held by their authors. Items appearing in MTO may be saved and stored in electronic or paper form, and may be shared among individuals for purposes of scholarly research or discussion, but may not be republished in any form, electronic or print, without prior, written permission from the author(s), and advance notification of the editors of MTO.
[2] Any redistributed form of items published in MTO must include the following information in a form appropriate to the medium in which the items are to appear:
This item appeared in Music Theory Online in [VOLUME #, ISSUE #] on [DAY/MONTH/YEAR]. It was authored by [FULL NAME, EMAIL ADDRESS], with whose written permission it is reprinted here.
[3] Libraries may archive issues of MTO in electronic or paper form for public access so long as each issue is stored in its entirety, and no access fee is charged. Exceptions to these requirements must be approved in writing by the editors of MTO, who will act in accordance with the decisions of the Society for Music Theory.
This document and all portions thereof are protected by U.S. and international copyright laws. Material contained herein may be copied and/or distributed for research purposes only.
Prepared by Brent Yorgason, Managing Editor and Tahirih Motazedian, Editorial Assistant