Music Theory Online |
|
The Online Journal of the Society for Music Theory |
Volume 5, Number 3 May, 1999
Copyright � 1999 Society for Music Theory
KEYWORDS: Schenker, metaphor, multimedia, Shockwave, Macromedia, QuickTime, digital audio, MIDI, Web
ABSTRACT: Multimedia renderings for the World-Wide Web are offered as models which extend the technology commonly employed in expressing Schenkerian analysis. The study begins with a new appraisal of the role of metaphor, establishing that the qualities of imitation and participation which are embodied in the communication of metaphor are central to a Schenkerian approach. The computer renderings suggest ways computer representation might aid in the understanding of spatial metaphors which are inherent in Schenker's methodology. Essential features such as linear shape, direction, and structural levels are modeled through incorporation of sound, hypertextually linked images and texts, and real-time simulation.
Editor's Note: This text version of Timothy Koozin's essay is derived from a multimedia version which can be viewed with a Shockwave-enabled web browser. The musical examples that accompany this version are taken from the original version, but reproduce only some of the visual, and none of the aural, content of the original. MTO readers are strongly encouraged to view the "full" version of the article.
Commentary/mto-talk
[1.1] The renderings of musical analysis which follow are based on analytical
approaches which have been influenced by Heinrich Schenker. This application forms a part
of a larger project to explore the study of Schenkerian analysis in multimedia computer
environments.
[1.2] A rich computer environment should offer new possibilities unavailable using
traditional media. These multimedia renderings are intended as models which extend the
technology currently employed in expressing Schenkerian analysis. Their purpose is to
explore how the use of electronic media might shape and expand expressions of meaning in
an analytical graph. Limited in scope, the examples are not in any way intended to
represent a complete pedagogy or a substitute for the study of orthodox Schenkerian
models. Building upon the premise that a Schenkerian graph is an illuminating metaphor for
representing musical processes, the aim in creating these multimedia analyses is to extend
the communicative power of the graph, exploring new ways to model essential features such
as linear shape, direction, and structural levels.
[2.1] Aristotle provides the classical definition of metaphor: "Metaphor (metaphora)
is the transference (epiphora) of a name to some other object."
[2.2] Schenker created evocative visual and textual metaphors of lasting communicative power to express his analytical methodology. Antecedent resemblances in the visual domain, derived primarily from symbols of musical notation, are combined with word antecedents which metaphorically relate musical space to terms of spatial orientation in the physical world. The process of induced resemblance is continually revised and renewed as readers study Schenker's contribution and the vast amount of more recent work which incorporates Schenkerian methodology.
[2.3] A Schenkerian graph visually communicates an analysis to a reader versed in its
embodied concepts and symbology--its "root metaphors." Meaning occurs as
correlations between the reader's conception of the music and the symbolic elements of the
graph resonate with expression of metaphor. "Reading" a graph requires an act of
imagination and poetic faith similar to that which any metaphorical text tacitly assumes.
It is worth noting, however, that for Schenker, the graph is more than an interpretation
of music expressed in a visual image. Schenker's stance toward his graphic analyses is
essentially metaphorical. For Schenker, the graph is the piece--a direct
manifestation of the musical artifact. Schenker's observations are founded on principles
he regarded as universals, which were "true in the sense of the truth of the great
masters."
[2.4] Aristotle writes, "Art either imitates nature or else gives the finishing
touches to what nature has left incomplete."
[2.5] This element of participation in making manifest for all to see that which is already present in nature (i.e., nature as represented in the "universal truths" embodied in the masterworks) perfectly characterizes Schenker's stance toward the musical work. In the his introduction to Free Composition, Schenker writes,
The musical examples which accompany this volume are not merely practical aids; they have the same power and conviction as the visual aspect of the printed composition itself (the foreground). That is, the graphic representation is part of the actual composition, not merely an educational means.
{11}
[2.6] The qualities of imitation and participation which are embodied in the
communication of metaphor are central to Schenker's approach. The great masters provided
the foreground, as represented through the visual artifact of the score.
[3.1] Schenker sometimes used the word "pictures" (Bilder) to refer
to analytical graphs. Though sometimes translated as "illustrations," the notion
of Schenker as a maker of pictures which render the art work visible is intriguing.
[3.2] Schenker himself was no advocate of new technology.
[4.1] Through the use of interactive computer graphics, interpretations of a sketch can
be embedded within it. The Shockwave-enabled graph employs imbedded "balloon"
annotations to provide a tutorial on some basic Schenkerian symbols. It is based on a
sketch by Forte and Gilbert. In this excerpt from the Chorale St. Antoni
attributed to Haydn, the neighbor note figure at m. 6 is expanded in the next measure,
returning again as an incomplete neighbor three measures later. As shown in the graph,
both D and C are elaborated with passing tones which receive consonant support.
[4.2] Graphic overlays in the example provide more information. Schenker interpreted
this five-bar phrase as a grouping of 3+2, with a tonic prolongation at measures 1-3
followed by a two-measure cadence. The dotted rhythm helps articulate the paired linear
motions each descending by third. Discussing the opening 5-measure phrase, Wallace Berry
suggests at least the possibility of a contrary interpretation of 2+3 measures, given the
change in texture, chromaticism, and harmony at measure 3. His conception of
"interphrase grouping" in the opening could apply as well to the consequent
phrase shown in the example.
[4.3] Schenker's voice leading graph in Free Composition (Figure 42, 2) provides a broader context for understanding the passage. Schenker's graph reveals a deeper level of the middleground for the entire theme, showing the dividing dominant which precedes the consequent phrase quoted in Forte and Gilbert's example. Note that the deep-level elaboration of scale degree 3 with an upper neighbor note in Schenker's graph (marked "n.n.") nicely corresponds to the foreground-level neighbor motions shown in Forte and Gilbert's graph at m. 6-7. (A scan of Schenker's complete voice leading graph is provided in the multimedia version with the kind permission of European American Music.)
[5.1] This example, based on a study by David Beach in Aspects of Schenkerian
Theory, employs color and sound to enhance the presentation of the graph.
[5.2] The deeper graph in blue shows how voice exchange occurs on both tonic and dominant harmony. This excerpt also illustrates the concept of interruption. The structural line descending from 3 (shown with stemmed notes highlighted in yellow) is interrupted after the motion to 2. Using the buttons alongside the example, it is possible to hear a "realization" of each level of the graph. This is a useful tool for helping students hear relationships among structural levels. Two realizations are offered for the middle reduction in red. Realization 2 interprets the tied F in the bass more literally, underscoring the connection for a complete octave ascent in the bass while underplaying the tonic harmony at measure 3.
[5.3] The contrasting realizations illustrate how an aural complement may enhance a graph and even provoke new ways of hearing a passage. While it is important to clarify that an audio rendering can only "simulate" a deeper structure, it may nonetheless provide a powerful aural metaphor.
[6.1] A graphic analysis can vividly represent hierarchical processes in music. While a musical graph customarily takes the form of a static image on a flat page, it may richly evoke spatial qualities of proportion and perspective. The animated rendering shown here underscores the element of perspective implied in any hierarchical analysis. Though perhaps a bit whimsical, it challenges our assumption that a musical graph is necessarily a static image on a flat page.
[6.2] Analysts have often displayed structural layers in a top-down reductive model.
From a pragmatic point of view, it makes sense to put the musical foreground first,
showing underlying layers of structure beneath it which are revealed through the process
of reduction. David Beach's well-known analysis of this passage is rendered in this
manner.
[6.3] We should hasten to clarify that this particular example represents three hierarchical layers--or more specifically, a passage in a composition, a metric reduction, and a middleground graph--and not a Schenkerian foreground, middleground and background. It does, nonetheless, serve to dramatize the element of spatial orientation we generally take for granted in layer analysis. Schenker's own graphs are generally rendered in a bottom-up model of compositional unfolding or "composing out" (Auskomponierung). This places the graphic reduction in the more privileged position, showing how the piece unfolds through elaboration and diminution of the fundamental structure.
[6.4] The question of "top-down" or "bottom-up" is, in part, an ideological issue. The point to be made here is that it is also a question of perspective, deriving ultimately from the metaphorical representation of music through spatial imagery.
[6.5] As Peter Westergaard rhymed in his "Geometries of Sound in Time":
To show the pulls and tugs, to show tension
we need--as Schenker found--a third dimension.{22}
Another simulation offered here is in inspired by Westergaard's rendering, in which he skews Schenker's layers "as they might have been redrawn by F.-E. von Cube." Tracing a line through the Schichten from foreground to a single vanishing point,
each now's a line, and all nows complete
their journeys at a triad where they meet.
[6.6] In the future, computer environments may enable us to represent the spatial qualities of music in new ways. Rendering software for animated three-dimensional imaging is now available, but music theorists have yet to take full advantage of it to model musical structures. Perhaps one day we will visualize music through vivid three-dimensional renderings, virtually moving through layered environments as we explore musical processes.
[7.1] This example demonstrates on-line delivery of synchronous high-resolution digitized images and audio. (Sound recording is used by permission of the Smithsonian Institution. The performers are Jaap Schroder and Marilyn McDonald, violins; Kenneth Slowik, cello; Konrad Junghanel, theorbo; James Weaver, organ. Score excerpt is used by permission of W. W. Norton.)
[7.2] It is possible to help students begin to recognize linear structures without necessarily invoking Schenkerian terminology. The graphic overlay shows the linear/motivic framework projected through a recurring melodic pattern which ascends by step (as shown in blue) and returns downward (as shown in red). A fauxbourdon-like intervallic pattern based on the opening motive occurs at m. 8-10. An augmentation of the ascending gesture is used to form the closing phrase of the first section, m. 15-19.
[7.3] A format employing score, audio, and graphic overlay can inform analyses while minimally intruding on the musical sources under study. It can be particularly useful in helping students understand how abstract theoretical concepts relate to their experience of a musical work.
[8.1] This analysis of a complete piece integrates analytical graphs, a MIDI audio performance, and a complete "scrolling" score. The ternary piece consists of three harmonically closed sections. The subtle differences distinguishing each section are significant. No perfect authentic cadence is heard until the end of the "B" section, underscoring the large-scale motion to the dominant.
[8.2] The motivic repetition highlighted in red marks the climax of the middle section and the return of the "A" section. The highpoint in the middle section recalls the opening notes of the piece, forming a local subdominant elaboration of the dominant. The climax near the end of the piece, highlighted in blue, is decidedly more dissonant by comparison, due to the clashing dominant pedal tone.
[8.3] At first glance, it might seem that the opening melody forms an unfolding of the tonic elaborated through passing tones, as shown in the Alternative View. But this interpretation (a), would suggest a misreading of the intervallic pattern in tenths in the outer voices (b). The opening gesture is better viewed as a nested neighbor motion (c). The linear intervallic pattern in tenths persists throughout, providing a powerful element of continuity in the piece. With remarkable economy, the bass voice goes its own way only to direct motion toward cadences.
[9.1] Friedrich Nietzsche wrote that the formation of metaphors is a fundamental human impulse:
What therefore is truth? A mobile army of metaphors, metonymies, anthropomorphisms: in short a sum of human relations which became poetically and rhetorically intensified.
{23}
Nietzsche asserts that language is fundamentally metaphorical. In the cognitive
hierarchy, visual metaphors are not mere illustrations of verbal expressions, but are more
deeply fundamental. It is not surprising, then, that a Schenkerian graph speaks louder
that words. As Nicholas Cook writes, "A Schenkerian analysis is not a scientific
explanation, but a metaphorical one; it is not an account of how people actually hear
pieces of music, but a way of imagining them."
[9.2] In discussing Cook's contributions, Lawrence M. Zbikowski writes in a recent Music
Theory Online article that "A musical culture is, in essence, a repertoire of
means for imagining music."
[9.3] To study how current technologies may beneficially impact the content and reception of theoretical discourse, we should explore ways to expand the metaphors through which we explain music. Pedagogically, multimedia designs are attractive because they enable us to present complex aural/visual ideas vividly. Concepts that might be cumbersome to explain verbally are often elucidated quickly through examples that can be seen and heard. It should not be tacitly assumed, however, that such applications of technology are "transparent" or that digital enhancements are automatically a good thing. For example, the digital appropriation of a musical "sound clip," score image, or other musical artifact is in some ways a subversive act which warrants thoughtful consideration. There is always danger of trivializing the very thing we wish to explore in all its depth. On-line academic forums are likely to become increasingly important in this regard, since they challenge scholars to use new media effectively to communicate substantive ideas. As serious musical analyses in digital formats become more pervasive in the scholarly community, they will provide models which can beneficially impact the quality of Internet-based instruction in the music curriculum.
[9.4] The ability to hypertextually link sounds, graphic analyses, and commentaries may provide powerful pedagogical tools and lead to open analyses which interrelate multiple analytical perspectives. But a word of caution is appropriate here as well. A fine Schenkerian analysis, like a fine piece of music, is rich in its layers of meaning. Embedded messages in an "interactive" rendering might elucidate meaning but could also detract from the communication of subtleties in a musical graph. In Schenkerian studies, there is also the danger of placing too much emphasis on the graph itself and its syntactical components, while neglecting the theoretical concepts on which it is based. Multimedia renderings may help students understand Schenkerian ideas and provide theorists with new formats for modeling music, but renderings in new media will not serve as a substitute for primary readings in Schenkerian literature.
[9.5] The examples provided in this study, while limited in scope, have been designed to go beyond the demonstration of multimedia as an useful presentation tool for teaching. The intention has been to scratch the surface of what may come in the future as theorists express Schenkerian concepts using the tools of multimedia. Through the incorporation of sound, hypertextually linked images and texts, and real-time simulation, current multimedia technology enables us to expand the ways we model our imaginings of musical works. This may lead to new conceptions about musical structure and the process through which we visualize and communicate musical ideas.
Return to beginning of article
1. The multimedia version of this essay requires a web browser
enabled with the Shockwave plug-in and QuickTime resources. For Windows machines, a
MIDI-compatible sound card is required for audio. With exception of Example 4, audio
examples are MIDI files played by the author and converted to QuickTime movie format.
Example 4 employs a Shockwave streaming audio sound clip of a professional ensemble. The
download sites referenced in the multimedia version have links offering installation
information and technical specifications for both Windows and Macintosh machines. Aspects
of this study were presented at a joint session on "Computer Imaging for Music Theory
and Musicology" at the National Conference of the American Musicological Society and
the Society for Music Theory in Phoenix, 1997. For a study focused particularly on
real-time simulations for musical analysis, see Timothy Koozin, "Graphic Approaches
to Musical Analysis in a Multimedia Environment," Computers in Music Research
5 (1995): 103-117.
Return to text
2. For a good introduction to the study of electronic text, see
Stephen A. Bernhardt's "The Shape of Text to Come: The Texture of Print on
Screens," College Composition and Communication 44/2 (May 1993): 151-175,
which includes a helpful bibliography. See also "Sense and Semblance: The
Implications of Virtuality" in Sven Birkerts, Readings (Saint Paul, MN:
Graywolf Press, 1999), 42-58.
Return to text
3. Web-based musical analyses incorporating multimedia include David
Headlam's "Multimedia for Music Study on the Web: Director from Macromedia,"
which contains much helpful information on the use of Shockwave technology, and Ann K.
McNamee's "Publishing and Pedagogy Using Multimedia on the World-Wide Web," both
of which appear in Music
Theory Online 3.5 (1997).
Return to text
4. While developing the present study, the author was interested to
note a number of messages posted to the mto-talk list addressing the topics of Schenkerian
analysis and metaphor, in particular, the thoughtful postings from Nicolas Meeus (4
February 1998), Larry Solomon (19 June 1998), and Nicholas Cook (22 June 1998). For a
broad assessment of research on metaphor, see Warren Shibles, Metaphor: An Annotated
Bibliography and History (Whitewater, Wisconsin: Language Press, 1971).
Return to text
5. Philip Wheelwright, "Semantics and Ontology" in Essays
on Metaphor, Warren Shibles, ed. (Whitewater, Wisconsin: Language Press, 1972),
66-67.
Return to text
6. Ibid.
Return to text
7. Ibid.
Return to text
8. Free Composition (Der freie Satz), translated and edited
by Ernst Oster (New York: Longman, 1979), xxii. See also Nicholas Cook, "Schenker's
Theory of Music as Ethics," Journal of Musicology 7 (1989): 438.
Return to text
9. Important sources on the evolving rhetoric of Schenkerian analysis
include William Rothstein, "The Americanization of Heinrich Schenker," In
Theory Only 9/1 (1986): 5-17; William Pastille, "Heinrich Schenker,
Anti-Organicist," 19th-Century Music 8/1 (1984): 29-36; Richard Littlefield
and David Neumeyer, "Rewriting Schenker: Narrative-History-Ideology," Music
Theory Spectrum 14/1 (1992): 38-65; Richard Cohn, "The Autonomy of Motives in
Schenkerian Accounts of Tonal Music," Music Theory Spectrum 14/2 (1992):
150-170; Joseph Lubben, "Schenker the Progressive: Analytic Practice in Der
Tonwille" Music Theory Spectrum 15/1 (1993): 59-75; Nicholas Cook,
"Schenker's Theory of Music as Ethics"; and Felix Salzer's dialog with Joseph
Straus in Unfoldings: Essays in Schenkerian Theory and Analysis. Carl Schachter,
Joseph N. Straus, ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), 3-14.
Return to text
10. Quoted from the Physics in Wheelwright, "Semantics
and Ontology," 70.
Return to text
11. Schenker, Free Composition, xxiii.
Return to text
12. Schenker's important work with manuscript sources shows his
great sensitivity to the visual impression of autographs, which, as he states in
describing his impression of Chopin's autograph of the Op. 45 Scherzo, have the power to
"speak directly to the eye and lead reliably to important insights." (From the
preface to the Schenker edition of Chopin's Op. 101, as quoted in John Rothgeb,
"Schenkerian theory and manuscript studies: modes of interaction" in Schenker
Studies, Hedi Siegel, ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 5. See also
William Rothstein, "Heinrich Schenker as an Interpreter of Beethoven's Piano
Sonatas," 19th-Century Music 8/1 (1984): 3-27).
Return to text
13. Schenker, Free Composition, xxiii, n. 1.
Return to text
14. I am grateful to Timothy Jackson for help on this point. In his
study, "Heinrich Schenker as Composition Teacher: the Schenker-Oppel Exchange"
forthcoming in Music Analysis, he cites references to the creation of
"Bilder" (pictures) in Schenker's so-called "Lesson Books" for
1929-31. The term also appears in later writings. For example, in Der Freie Satz
Schenker writes, "Die von mir Urlinie-Tafeln benannten Bilder zeigen die vorletzte
Stimmf�hrungsschicht, auf sie folgt der Vordergrund." Neue musickalische
Theorien und Phantasien, Vol. III, Der Freie Satz, second ed., edited and
revised by Oswald Jonas (Universal Edition, 1956), 58. Ernst Oster's translation in Free
Composition appears on p. 26.
Return to text
15. Christopher Collins, Reading the Written Image: Verbal Play,
Interpretation, and the Roots of Iconophobia (Pennsylvania State University Press,
1991), 1. In contrast, see Felix Salzer's comments on the "self-sufficient and
self-explaining" aspect of Schenker's approach in Heinrich Schenker, Five Graphic
Analyses (Dover, 1969), 16-17.
Return to text
16. See Amarnath Gupta, Simone Santini, and Ramesh Jain, "In
Search of Information in Visual Media," Communications of the ACM 40/12
(1997): 35-62. The volume is devoted to visual information retrieval and includes several
bibliographies.
Return to text
17. See Schenker's comments on technology and culture in Free
Composition, xxiii-xxiv, 6, and 160.
Return to text
18. Allen Forte and Steven Gilbert. Introduction to Schenkerian
Analysis (W. W. Norton, 1982), 20.
Return to text
19. Wallace Berry, Musical Structure and Performance (Yale
University Press, 1989), 29-30. Schenker's sketches of the entire theme appear in Free
Composition, Fig. 42, 2 and Fig 138, 3. Many writers have discussed this passage,
including Lerdahl and Jackendoff, William Benjamin, Allen Forte, Joel Lester, and Jonathan
Kramer. For a summary, see Kramer, The Time of Music (Schirmer Books, 1988),
444-45, n. 74. The piece is also discussed in H. Lee Riggins and Gregory Proctor, "A
Schenker Pedagogy," Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy 3/1 (1989): 13-21.
Return to text
20. David Beach. "Schenker's Theories: A Pedagogical View"
in Aspects of Schenkerian Theory (Yale Univ. Press, 1983), p. 7.
Return to text
21. Ibid.
Return to text
22. Peter Westergaard sets Schenker's three levels for the first
waltz in Brahms' Op. 31 in "Geometries of Sound in Time," read as the keynote
address of the 1994 Annual Meeting of the Society for Music Theory in Tallahassee,
Florida, printed in Music Theory Spectrum 18/1 (1996): 20-21. See Felix-Eberhard
von Cube's three-dimensional renderings in The Book of the Musical Artwork: An
Interpretation of the Musical Theories of Heinrich Schenker. Trans. and ed., David
Neumeyer, George R. Boyd, and Scott Harris (Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1988), 226
and 275.
Return to text
23. Friedrich Nietzsche. "On Truth and Falsity in their
Extramoral Sense" in Essays on Metaphor, Warren Shibles, ed. (Whitewater,
Wisconsin: The Language Press, 1972), p. 5, reprinted from The Complete Works of
Friedrich Nietzsche, Vol. 2, trans. by M. A. Mugge (New York: Russell and Russel,
1964).
Return to text
24. Nicholas Cook. Music, Imagination, and Culture (Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 1990), p. 4.
Return to text
25. Lawrence M. Zbikowski. "Metaphor and Music Theory:
Reflections from Cognitive Science" Music Theory Online 4/1 (1998), part
2.2.
Return to text
Copyright � 1999 by the Society for Music Theory.
All rights reserved.
[1] Copyrights for individual items published in Music Theory Online (MTO) are held by their authors. Items appearing in MTO may be saved and stored in electronic or paper form, and may be shared among individuals for purposes of scholarly research or discussion, but may not be republished in any form, electronic or print, without prior, written permission from the author(s), and advance notification of the editors of MTO.
[2] Any redistributed form of items published in MTO must include the following information in a form appropriate to the medium in which the items are to appear:
This item appeared in Music Theory Online in [VOLUME #, ISSUE #] on [DAY/MONTH/YEAR]. It was authored by [FULL NAME, EMAIL ADDRESS], with whose written permission it is reprinted here.
[3] Libraries may archive issues of MTO in electronic or paper form for public access so long as each issue is stored in its entirety, and no access fee is charged. Exceptions to these requirements must be approved in writing by the editors of MTO, who will act in accordance with the decisions of the Society for Music Theory.
This document and all portions thereof are protected by U.S. and international copyright laws. Material contained herein may be copied and/or distributed for research purposes only.
prepared by
Eric J. Isaacson, General Editor, 01 June 1999
Updated 18 Nov 2002