EXAMPLE TESTING



Example 1. A melodic family in Mode 1 Greek church chant, focusing on variants of the formulas D-init., G-med., and A-med

Example 1 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 2. Mavromatis’s (2019) figure 2, modeling note-to-note probabilities

Example 2 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 3. Mavromatis’s (2019) figure 3, modeling formula-to-formula probabilities

Example 3 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 4. Frankie and Johnnie schema paraphrased after Stoia (2013, 206, Example 8), comparison of the first four measures of several songs representing the schema

Example 4 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 5. Transcription of soloist’s melody sung over “Ngengele Gbaba Egwu” refrain (transcription by Jonathan Eldridge II)

Example 5 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 6. The Prinner, High-2, and “High-1” (cf. Gjerdingen’s 2007 “la-to-sol flourish”) as a variable outline for melodic diminutions

Example 6 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 7. Composite representation of Prinner exemplars (from Symons 2017, 74)

Example 7 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 8. Gjerdingen’s Complete Cadence with a skeletal soprano

Example 8 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 9. The Cudworth Cadence (after Gjerdingen 2007), a fixed surface formula embellishing the Complete Cadence

Example 9 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 10. The Converging Cadence / Indugio variable outline

Example 10 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 11. Analysis of excerpt from Simon Leduc, Op. 4, no. 1, mvt. 1, mm. 1–12 after Gjerdingen (2007, 290) and Rabinovitch (2019a, 9–10)

Example 11 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 12. Emergent galant schemata in Example 11 with comments on discrepancies between Gjerdingen (2007) and our view

Example 12 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 13. Francesco Geminiani, Sonata for Cello and Continuo, Op. 5 no. 3, mvt. 2, mm. 1–10

Example 13 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 14. Translating Geminiani’s exposition excerpt into a soprano-skeletal string. The indication “. . .” represents non-schema-specific strings

Example 14 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 15. Synoptic view of schemata that passed the threshold

Example 15 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 16. Synoptic view of skeletal strings for schemata that passed the threshold

Example 16 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 17. An interopus comparison of the 27 pieces in the sample

Example 17 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 18. Quantz (Exposition #20), Skeleton of mm. 1–8

Example 18 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 19. Skeleton of Exposition #17 by Locatelli

Example 19 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 20. C. P. E. Bach, Sonata Wq. 61/2/iii, mm.1–25

Example 20 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 21. C. P. E. Bach, Sonata Wq. 61/2/iii, outline of mm. 1–25

Example 21 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 22. C. P. E. Bach, Sonata Wq. 61/2/i, mm. 1–24

Example 22 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 23. C. P. E. Bach, Sonata Wq. 61/2/i, outline of mm. 1–24

Example 23 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 24. C. P. E. Bach, Fantasy Wq 61/3, mm. 1–36

Example 24 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 25. C. P. E. Bach, Fantasy Wq. 61/3, outline of mm. 1–36

Example 25 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)

Example 26. Summarizing formal milestones in Wq. 61/3, mm. 1–36

Example 26 thumbnail

(click to enlarge)